CIPFA has always emphasised the need for a local narrative to accompany the figures in the Resilience index. The table below shows our rationale for the indicators and is intended to support explanation and understanding of the index.
For the release of the 2022-2023 resilience index an updated set of data has been included to include debt and reserves relative to income.
The timing of the index follows the release of DLUHC statistics (i.e Revenue Outturn) and is based on publicly available data. We are aware that the pandemic altered the local authority funding landscape in 2020-2021, and any interpretation of the data should be viewed through this lens.
The table below provides detail on the indicators and what they highlight in the context of the resilience index.
Indicator |
Detail |
Impact |
Additional supportive note |
Reserves sustainability measure |
How long an authority's reserves will last if they continue drawing them down at the same rate |
The longer an authority's reserves will last, the less risk |
|
Level of reserves |
Earmarked + unallocated |
Lower levels of reserves imply higher risk |
|
Change in reserves |
Percentage change in reserves over the past three years |
Negative changes imply higher risk |
|
Gross external debt |
Level of gross external debt |
The higher the gross debt level, the higher the risk |
|
Social care ratio |
Amount of expenditure on demand-led services – this determines the level of flexibility in the budget |
More flexibility, less risk The higher the ratio, the higher the risk |
|
Fees and charges |
Total fees and charges as a proportion of service expenditure |
The higher the ratio the lower the risk (income) A greater amount of fees/charges will make councils more resilient as they have more control over budgets |
|
Council tax |
Council tax requirement/net revenue expenditure |
Higher the ratio the lower the risk (income) |
|
Business rates |
Percentage growth in business rates above the baseline |
The higher the ratio the higher the risk |
|
Children's social care |
Ofsted judgement on overall services |
The lower the rating, the higher the risk |
|
Auditors VFM assessment |
Auditors VFM assessment |
Lower assessment, the higher the risk |
|
All calculations are based on the latest available annual data unless otherwise stated.
Reserves measures exclude public health and schools reserves. These reserves are ring-fenced and cannot be used to support expenditure in other areas.
CIPFA will continue to discuss opportunities for improving the RO form data collection.
If there are any inaccuracies in the auditors VFM assessment, please contact our data team on analytics@cipfa.org with evidence and we will update our records.